By realmnova 
Sony has recently strongly refuted the latest legal documents that were sent to him in connection with his new book ” Origin of the Wild ” , copying the Horizon series of copyright suits, pointing directly to his claim that it was “purely unfounded” and emphasizing that “the tort of harm is a fait accompli and is still ongoing”. Sony also alleges that the call to order was an attempt to replicate the “Visual style, sound, role and narrative” of the Horizon series, including the hiring of a composer, ” Horizon: a West Ban” , not only violated the role copyright of the leading actor, Eloy, but also its value as a symbol of PlayStation ‘ s brand.
In July of this year, Sony filed a copyright suit against tentendance.The jury was asked to examine the copyright and trademark infringement and to prevent the “prompt release” of the new title, “The Origin of the Wild”, accusing it of “a blatant copying of Eloy, the main feature of the Horizon, deliberately misleading the player to interpret it as a new version of the Horizon series”. The call was followed by a revision of the game ‘s Steam page and promotional material.Last month, the inquiry argued that the origin of the wilderness was not “blind cloning” for the Horizon series.Sone was accused of attempting “to convert elements of the generic subject matter into proprietary assets”, insisting that he used only “classic creations not protected by Sony’s exclusive rights”. However, according to The Game Post, Sony’s latest legal document refutes the argument that “the game is postponed until 2027” as an argument that it is premature, refuting its game as a “save and refusing responsibility”.
In his paper, Sony wrote: “It is nonsense that the so-called postponement of the publication of the communication is the mere assertion that the proceedings are premature. The violation is a fait accompli and continues. Despite the public’s discovery of the nature of the cave and its expression of indignation, the arraignment continues to promote the game of abuse and refuses to be held accountable for its actions.” Sony also accused the arraignment of playing a “shell game” through associated entities such as the Arctic Light Studio, Level Infoite and Proxima Beta, but stressed that the arraignment was always “over the board”. The petition states: “The arraignment seeks to evade responsibility through a subsidiary structure, but its annual newspaper explicitly aggregates the proceeds of the game business with the debt and always promotes games such as the Origin of the Wild, in the name of the `tendering’, without distinguishing between subsidiaries”. Sony condemned in particular the “speculation of the goodwill and reputations of the role symbols of Eloy”, stating that “the abuses were so egregious that many media and players had pointed out their roles to the alarming similarities of the role of the Russians, with the narration of the image `from red hair to make-up’ of Eloy”.
The application added that “the flagrant violation of the original piece of the Sorbonne Origin has jeopardized the continued success of the Horizon series, including the current plan of expansion”. Sony eventually requested the court to dismiss the cassation motion. The case is still pending.